|
Are you
ready for the death of science?
The word science comes from
the Latin word scientia, from scire, meaning "to
know."
In other words, science is
supposed to mean knowledge, but to be truly useful
this must be true knowledge.
Modern science, like ancient
medieval science, however -- though enjoying its
greatest popularity and media propaganda heyday --
is proving to be false on so many fronts that its
beginning to look like kindergarten variety
knowledge as compared to the graduate-level
expertise it promises and claims, but only
pretends, to be.
Modern science, as a
discipline and as a means to reach, accept,
understand and propagate the supposed truth about
ourselves and the world in which we all live, is at
best nothing more than a grade school primer, and
at worst it is an outright fraud in too many
respects.
Although most alleged
"scientists" today might bristle at these words of
truth, this is the primary reason these words
succinctly state the case and set forth a factual
indictment against science, as we think we know
it.
For modern science in reality
is something altogether different from what most
people conceive it to be. For example, it
has been learned that researchers often "fudge" or
alter their experimental results to match
expectations, to get grant or research money that
might otherwise be withheld.
And the drug companies, which
hold the purse strings for a lot of this "academic"
work, have been known to bury studies that disagree
with their profit-driven motives, even though those
studies reveal life-threatening dangers in their
drug-oriented approach, with specific drugs they
intend to market, and spend millions to bring to
market.
Like gambling, prostitution,
or any other vice known to modern man, science is
prone to all the wicked twists and perversions of
which human nature is capable.
Some foolish "Christians"
today think that Paul and his writings somehow
twisted the meaning of the Savior's true message,
and they blame all the wrong turns in their chosen
faith on this source, rather than on what the
Apostle Peter rightly pinpointed as the real source
of the problem:
"Bear in mind
that our Sovereign's patience means salvation,
just as our dear brother Paul also wrote with
the wisdom Yahveh gives him. He writes
the same in all his letters, speaking in them of
these matters. His letters contain some
things that are difficult to understand, which
ignorant and unstable people distort, as they do
other scriptures, to their own destruction"
(II Peter 3:15-16).
Paul had something to say,
prophetically, about these modern scientists,
particularly in light of recent catastrophes and
far worse things that are bound to come -- unless
we wake up and repent of worshiping at the idols of
science and so-called "evolutionary" style thinking
-- in Romans 1, verses 18 through 23:
"The wrath of
Yahveh is being revealed from heaven against all
unrighteousness and wickedness of men who
suppress the truth by their wickedness, since
what may be known about Yahveh is evident to
them, because Yahveh made it evident to them.
Because since the creation of the world
Yahveh's invisible qualities -- His eternal
power and righteous nature -- have been clearly
seen, being understood from what has been made,
so that men are without excuse. For
although they knew about Yahveh, they neither
glorified Him as the Almighty One nor gave
thanks to Him, but they became
foolishly vain in their discussions and their
unintelligent hearts were darkened.
Although they declared themselves to be
wise, they became simpletons and exchanged the
glory of the immortal Almighty Ones for images
made to look like mortal man and birds and
animals and reptiles."
For example, man is depicted
as developing from apes, rather than being formed
from the dust of the ground in a miraculous
creation by a wise and capable Creator.
How can we know for certain
that modern science has darkened hearts?
We need look no farther than
science's opinion of our solar system and the
distant stars. In their red-shift theory,
for example, everything seems to point back to
earth with an accusing finger, because the fault
lies in this mistaken concept also known as the
"big bang" or "the expanding universe."
In truth, evidence of high
red-shift quasars emerging from the midst of low
red-shift galaxies is being ignored and vilified by
"mainstream" scientists, because it means the size
and age of the universe are unknowns, rather than
the supposed "knowns" they are assumed to be, and
that many of the "distant" stars are really a lot
closer than assumed.
Modern science doesn't even
correctly understand our own sun, which it claims
to be a giant ball of nuclear chain reactions from
an intensely-heated core, supposedly created by
gravity from gases that commonly escape the earth's
gravity.
Yet every suppressed fact so
far gathered from satellites and by other means,
belies this false 19th and 20th century
concoction.
Rather than informing or
reforming scientific opinion, these facts have been
pompously swept under the rug of supposed
scientific "infallibility," much as the facts of a
round earth that revolves around the sun were once
similarly treated in an earlier dark age.
All who do not stick to the status quo
"understanding" and theories du jure are today also
proclaimed the equivalent of heretics, fools or
knaves.
But the facts reveal that our
sun actually has a relatively cool interior, as
seen through the eyes of sun spots, which are like
windows into the sun's much cooler surface, and its
atmosphere is actually composed not of burning
gases but of plasma discharge electrical activity
very similar to lightning, and ball lightning in
particular, here on earth.
The power source for the sun,
therefore, is actually external to the sun itself
in an electrically-charged universe wholly
different from that presently conceived by modern
science. The sun, in reality, is like a huge
positively-charged anode, which needs a
negatively-charged cathode (as in a dual or binary
star system, to feed it with continual electrical
activity, much as comets are not dirty snowballs
but are actually electrically charged planetoids
throwing off sparks as they travel through the
solar wind-fed electrically-charged space of our
solar system.
Does this mean that the
auroras at both north and south poles are, in
reality, an interaction between an interior light
source within a hollow earth, formed like a hollow
geode rock from plasma discharge electrical
activity, and the exterior sun?
Or are we somehow wiser than
the author of Genesis who said that light was
created on the first day, but the exterior sun that
we know was not created until the fourth day?
Or do we know more than wise Yaveb, who said
of Creator Yahveh in Job 26:7:
"He spreads out
the northern skies over empty space; He suspends
the earth over nothing"?
And what else could Revelation
9, verses 1, 2 and 11, chapter
11 verse 7, chapter
17 verse 8, and chapter
20 verses 1 and 3 mean -- when they speak of a
"bottomless pit" -- unless there are openings that
either go straight through a hollow earth, as from
one pole to the other, or from the outer surface to
an inner surface, as in a shaft or pit, as
described?
Either scripture is true and
modern science is full of deceptions, or its the
other way around. Whatever you choose to
believe, I will not put my faith in modern science
or carnal, sinful humanity to reveal the hidden
truths of creation, and the Almighty Sovereign
Creators these reveal.
# # #
|
