"Flaw Enfarcement Reaps Bitter Harvest"

ODAY the "land of freedom" called the United states has become one of the most dishonest, dangerous and crooked nations in the world.

    And nowhere is this more true than in the legal systems of America.   In fact, there are now 30 times more prisoners, in jails and prisons across America, in proportion to the population, than in Communist China!

    The United States alone now accounts for one fourth -- 25 percent -- of all prisoners in the entire world, with more than 2 million incarcerated people, which is one out of every 150 people (including children and the elderly) in the entire nation!

    And if you think they're all "guilty" of something, you simply haven't been paying much attention to what's really going on in our courts, the hotbed of all this flaw enfarcement.

    According to Dr. Les Sachs, a regular contributor to the online journal and judicial watchdog group J.A.I.L. 4 Judges (jail4judges.org):

    "No one imprisons people so readily, or casually, as does America.   As you learn more about America's horrifying legal system, you find out how easily and carelessly America arrests people, and tosses innocent people into prison.

    "It is established that America has at least 100,000 innocent people in jail, but the statistics of innocence may be far higher.   The number of people known to be innocent, and yet were actually sentenced to death in recent years in America, is already running into the hundreds.

    "You see American lawyers are controlled by the judges, and don't really work for you.   Even if you are paying a lawyer huge amounts of money, he or she doesn't really work for you.   In fact, they may sell you down the river to the jailhouse.

    "Lawyers are directly under the thumb of judges because those who try to fight the system often find themselves not only disbarred, but also criminally charged and jailed.   It is a savage culture of legal fraud, where lawyers work with judges to rob and terrify people, especially all those who dare to question the system.

    "And if they arrest you, police and lawyers like to pile on all sorts of criminal charges.   The idea is to charge you with 10 crimes, because it makes you sound bad, and maybe convict you on three of them or you will accept a plea bargain on one or two of them.

    "Any kind of guilty plea, and they call it a success, even though you were totally innocent.   For the police and prosecutors, it's all a kind of sporting game, so they can bring about their high conviction rate.

    "In the Hollywood version, there are brave lawyers who will fight for your rights to win justice for you.   In reality, you can't find an American lawyer brave enough to fight judicial corruption, even if you are innocent and the judge's friends threatened to murder you or send you to jail for the rest of your life.

    "America is the land of fear when it comes to the legal system.   And it's getting worse all the time, as judges and lawyers get away with their crimes in broad daylight, simply because they know no one will stop them or hold them accountable." (American Free Press, "U.S. Courts #1, U.S. Legal System Being Labeled Most Corrupt in the World" Nov.14, 2005, Vol. V, No. 46, p. 10).

    What, exactly, has led to this sad state of affairs?

    This author has personally experienced the sting of false accusation and the false verdict of "guilty" in a felony trial, without evidence or proof of guilt, while deprived of the rights to any assistance of counsel at any time -- both at trial and on appeal -- and even the right to call any other than hostile witnesses at trial, where the "evidence" was a doctored, altered document.

    And no appeals process to date (taking nearly six years so far) has proved capable of looking honestly at these facts to exonerate or remove the onus of false conviction (of a minister, author and publisher, no less) that ensued.

    How can such things happen?   Why are lawless judges, lawyers and prosecuting attorneys able to get away with even murder of innocent people through the "legal" system, apparently, with seeming impunity in America today?

    The answer to this corruption of justice, I believe, lies in obstruction of one of the most fundamental legal institutions, without which Americans are left defenseless against the oppression of the tyrants in black robes who are now running rampant in our midst.

    You see, jury tampering has become the norm in courts across America, and I'm not talking about just trial, or petite, juries but about so-called grand juries.

    The way this works is that judges, courts and prosecuting attorneys have decided, without historical precedent, to assume total and arbitrary control over access to grand juries.

    Today, most grand jurors are told that they cannot be approached by anyone other than the D.A. (District Attorney) and that only the D.A. has the right or authority to bring matters before the grand jury.

    Of course this would automatically mean that a corrupt D.A. (or judge ) could never be indicted by a grand jury, along with any other corrupt personnel, such as court clerks who regularly obstruct justice or refuse to answer pertinent questions by non-lawyers because: "That would be practicing law without a license."

    They forget (or never knew) that no judge is required to be a lawyer, and neither are legislators, those who pass the laws, required to be licensed attorneys (at least they aren't supposed to be, if the "separation of powers" into the three branches of government -- the executive, the judicial and the legislative -- has any meaning or fulfillment in reality whatever).

    Neither is there any actual "license" to practice law issued by any government agency (so-called "state" bar associations are, in reality, nothing more than unlawful monopolies condoned, but not authorized, by any state legislation).

    One way court clerks and judges obstruct justice is by pretending that grand juries and jurors -- rather than their deliberation over any particular matter brought to their attention, are supposedly top secret, and that not even the identity of the individuals comprising a grand jury cannot be divulged to the public.

    This effectively makes grand juries into private and secret star chamber style proceedings, which is unconstitutional, and an unlawful obstruction of justice.

    In fact, the laws of every state say that anyone can challenge the appointment of any grand juror for good cause.   Now how could this ever happen if the public is forbidden to know exactly who is appointed, or proposed to be appointed, as a grand juror?

    As to who, exactly, is allowed to bring matters before a grand jury for its consideration, let's let a common legal reference book -- one used (supposedly) by all lawyers and judges in America -- Black's Law Dictionary, answer the matter:

    "Grand jury investigation. Investigation conducted by a grand jury into possible wrongdoing.   Generally, such are conducted under the aegis of the prosecuting official and they may or may not result in indictments" (Black's Abridged Fifth Edition, 1983, emphasis added).

    The word "generally" certainly does not mean always or must.   And it cannot mean never can anyone but a prosecuting official conduct or bring a matter before a grand jury.

    It should be remembered that, according to this same reference source's definition of a grand jury, it is: "A jury of inquiry... whose duty is to receive complaints and accusations in criminal cases, hear evidence adduced on the part of the state, and find bills of indictment in cases where they are satisfied a trial ought to be had" (ibid.).

    "Adduced" means:

    "To present, bring forward, offer, introduce.   Used particularly with reference to evidence" (ibid.).

    But "on the part of the state" does not mean that only a state may adduce evidence.   It actually means that the grand jury is acting on behalf of a state, as part of the state's judicial mechanism for hearing evidence, which can be adduced by anyone who happens to have that evidence in their possession.

    For example, such evidence often takes the form of testimony by witnesses.   When a grand jury asks for testimony, it is demanding the witnesses it calls before it to adduce evidence for the grand jury to consider in its deliberation of the complaints or accusations brought before it.

    Of course, not even the calling of witnesses is a power exercised by most grand juries these days; this important stage of the process being left to the prosecuting officials, generally the D.A., by misled and disenfranchised grand jurors who assume that all such lawful powers vest in some "authority" other than themselves.

    In fact, if the evidence to be adduced concerns a corrupt official, including the judge or D. A., then those individuals can and must be excluded, not only from the grand jury room during testimony, but also during their deliberation into the accusation or complaint against such a corrupt official.

    Such an official cannot stand as a roadblock or hurdle to prevent access to a grand jury, which is nothing less than obstructing justice, which is also defined by this same legal reference as follows:

    "Obstructing justice.   Impeding or obstructing those who seek justice in a court, or those who have duties or powers of administering justice therein.   The act by which one or more persons attempt to prevent, or do prevent, the execution of lawful process." (Ibid., emphasis added).

    Notice, once again, the fact that anyone seeking justice in a court -- including you -- who is prevented from personally bringing a matter before a grand jury, or to its attention, outside the influence and control of a possibly corrupt judge or D.A. if evidence exists for their indictment, has had justice impeded or obstructed, even if the one obstructing justice is a judge, the D.A. or a court clerk!

    It is just such impeding or obstructing of justice that has been preventing so many corrupt judges and prosecutors, or other corrupt court officials, from being indicted and tried as the criminals they are, especially those that manufacture, destroy or alter "evidence" and then place this tainted "proof" before gullible juries and obtain convictions thereby.

    Don't think this happens?   Take a look at the following scan of State's Exhibit 1 (<=Click the link to view) in my own recent felony trial, compared with the original filed document (<= Click this link to view).

    Notice anything missing in the first document?   The file stamp showing where and when that document was filed is missing.   It was whited out.   If you compare the two, you'll notice some remnants of the original file stamp that didn't get removed.

    Considering the facts that this so-called "evidence" was presented by the D.A. in a case in which the actual filing of the document was a matter to be proved to the jury -- and it was proved to the court that the document was actually filed on that date by a corrupt county judge as a means of entrapping the defendant in another case (this case being retaliatory prosecution because the other matter could not be brought to trial, due to this and other corruptions of the record), and that the same document was filed two days later as a result of this entrapment (see and compare the file stamp on that document <= by clicking here), the grand jury's indictment being amended by the court to reflect the date of the latter filing, a document which could not possibly have been the source of State's Exhibit 1 (observe how the file stamp on that document is over some of the text of that document, and does not match up with the traces of the original file stamp erased from State's Exhibit 1) -- there is only one possible conclusion to be made from all these facts.

    The jury's "guilty" verdict was against the evidence adduced at trial, and that evidence was deliberately falsified by the D.A. and assistant D.A., the court reporter, or all of them together acting as coconspirators, to railroad an unjust guilty verdict against a factually innocent defendant.

    Yet the defendant -- this author -- has been prevented thus far, by a corrupt court clerk, from personally presenting this evidence before the grand jury, to bring the guilty individuals to justice, who abused the trust and purpose of the grand jury by bringing false charges using manufactured evidence, through deliberate and intentional entrapment and corruption of documentary evidence, to trial against an innocent man!

    The district judge joined this conspiracy by violating the federal constitutional 6th amendment guarantees to allow a defendant to call witnesses in his favor and to have assistance of counsel for his defense, either at trial or on appeal.

    The appellate courts have also joined the conspiracy by refusing to review the limited and only reporter's records on appeal that prove these and other abuses, ordering not only the issuing of the mandate, but also allowing the total destruction of all records in the case 30 days thereafter, by order of the trial court.   In addition, the local federal district court under judge Walter S. Smith, Jr. (of Waco, Texas Mount Carmel infamy) has, thus far, failed to act immediately, to prevent incarceration against the law, by refusing to convene a habeas hearing post haste to consider the evidence of these crimes.

    In "explaining" the delay, the federal district court clerk said, "We have a lot of cases on the docket," while this author noted the fact that no court was in session in either courtroom on that day, or any other day he has visited the federal district courthouse (such as when the habeas paperwork was originally filed).

    According to Black's, Racketeering is:

    "An organized conspiracy to commit the crimes of extortion or coercion, or attempts to commit extortion or coercion.   From the standpoint of extortion, it is the obtaining of money or property from another, without his consent, induced by the wrongful use of force or fear.   The fear which constitutes the legally necessary element in extortion is induced by oral or written threats to do an unlawful injury to the property of the threatened person by means of explosives, fires, or otherwise; or to kill, kidnap, or injure him or a relative of his or some member of his family.

    "Activities of organized criminals who extort money from legitimate businesses by violence or other forms of threats or intimidation or conduct of illegal enterprises such as gambling, narcotics traffic, or prostitution" (ibid.).

    Money can be in the form of unlawfully induced fines or bail for nonarrestable alleged "offenses", property can include your person and time, and coercion through force or fear includes kidnapping to a jail without a lawful warrant for arrest.

    Examine the following excerpt from the document labeled State's Exhibit 1 (<= Click here to view), the filing of which led to false arrest under a perjured warrant (<= Click here to view) in which the date of "arrest" was falsified by the sheriff and an alleged "deputy sheriff," who didn't even have a lawful oath of office, while the date on the same alleged "deputy's" false accusation "complaint" for "resisting arrest" (<=Click the link to view), and the arrest warrant (<=Click the link to view) issued under it, give the true date of the false arrest.

    Is there any doubt that a "judgment' or "conviction" citing a false date of arrest, based on such perjured documents, is void on its face?

    Yet the highest courts of the same state (Texas) have thus far turned a deliberate blind eye to all of this, as has the state Attorney General, the Texas Rangers, and even the local FBI, among others (some laughed at my plight, others accused me of lying, since nothing like this could actually happen, and one FBI agent said there was no federal law broken, so there was nothing he or the FBI could do)!

    Aiding and abetting in a criminal act, such as obstructing justice, is part and parcel with a criminal cabal or conspiracy (and most of the above mentioned abuses, including mail fraud, forged evidence, and willful destruction of evidence, are predicate acts under R.I.C.O., the Racketeering Influenced Corrupt Organizations Act (under Title 18, sections 1961, 1964 of the U.S.C.A.; United States Code Annotated) for state actors, and under the Bivens Act (Title 28 U.S.C.A., sections 1331, 2201 and 2202 for federal actors, including judges, and arguably even chief judges who cover for corrupt district judges), and are just as onerous as the original crimes (false arrest, false imprisonment, entrapment) themselves.

    Concealing (such as falsifying) a document is a predicate act ("Related to or being any of a series of criminal acts upon which prosecution for racketeering may be predicated; a predicate crime" source: Merriam-Webster's Dictionary of Law, 1996) under R.I.C.O. (Can you see where this matter is headed eventually?), as are many of the other constitutional abuses either committed or condoned by the increasingly lawless courts of America today.

    Many of our modern laws (such as the one under which the false felony charge was brought against myself), written and put on the books for just such purpose, are so deliberately vague and subject to liberal interpretation that they actually condone and create criminal acts against honest, innocent people by our lawless courts and (often deliberately) misguided law enforcement agencies.

    Flaw enfarcement, such as it exists in the united States today, does indeed reap a bitter harvest, as the incarceration rate for innocent -- mainly poor -- Americans denied true justice, reeks to high heaven with the intolerable stench of despotism and tyranny never before seen on earth, not even in the greatly distorted, often false, malicious and vindictive postwar propaganda machinery of the American government-media cabal of the supposed exploits of Nazi Germany!

    Flaw Enfarcement is an abomination of corrupt human nature sunk to its lowest level of brute force and enslavement of the innocent, the poor and the undefended (including those "defended" by servants of the court, beholden to it for their livelihood) under any supposedly "legitimate" pretext.

    It is plain to see why, as a result of all this, the law today has become an abandonment, rather than the perfection, of common sense, that it was once (obviously incorrectly) assumed to be.